Gameguru Mania

The Outlaw · Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2004 2:47 pm Post subject:

I dont think that it is the best game ever although it is good.

Although sure it is a great game but not the best of em all. ID software should have got D3 way back. It has been a very long time when D2 was done and over with.

CaptStar · Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:53 pm Post subject:

You don't even have Doom 3 yet, how do you know its only good?
And besides, even if you have the alpha, that isnt even the full game, just a demonstration from E3.

The Outlaw · Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:44 pm Post subject:

My apologies guys, didnt read the complete message before I replied.

Sorry CaptStar Embarassed

didnt read the whole post before answering, guess got a bit excited in all this Doom 3 hype that has been created over the time.

CaptStar · Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 5:34 pm Post subject:

BLOODUK · Junior Member Joined: 08 Jun 2004 Posts: 121

worse than diakatana

Embarassed

CaptStar · Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2004 2:28 am Post subject:

Im getting this on Friday, and I dont care about the AI and repetivity, its a first person shooter, not an RPG or something like that.

maga · Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2004 3:24 pm Post subject:

Doom3 , this is an example of how a technology can, single-handedly, save a game from ruin...

CaptStar · Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:26 am Post subject:

FX5900 · Junior Member Joined: 07 Jun 2004 Posts: 216

gameplay is VERY thin.
graphics are okay, but not as earth shattering as they've been made out to be. It's got lights and bumpmapping... big deal.

JanSolo · Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2004 6:19 am Post subject:

Some scary parts, BUT..

- the game play is repetitive.
- weapon sounds are underwhelming.
- the lack if lighting, while providing atmosphere, gets old after a while.
- reading emails and listening to audio logs is not very... interesting.
- needs more cowbell.

xxxx · Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2004 9:02 pm Post subject:

exactly. it's nice to hear from people that call it as it is, rather than blow something up more than it's worth. and im talking in light of giving this game credit. graphics alone don't make a game, although for others it does. can you believe Creative is trying to get a patent made with Doom3. the sound is good, but it's nothing i'm saying, god damn i love my Audigy 2.

UnDeRFiRe · Contributor Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 3

the game looks AWESOME
sounds good
playability is that classic style "wasd"

so..............
AH

i'm going to play a little more..............come back later

djmaux · Contributor Joined: 01 Oct 2004 Posts: 2

Personaly what i think has happened to make doom3 rather poor is this.
When a games company start to make a game they have to guess how good system specs are and use the correct graphics engine to fit the computer power. Just how when they started to make hl2 they had to use an engine 3-4 years ahead of its time. I think ID have screweed this up.
This game should of come out 18 months ago and would of been great but now the engine is totally dated and hl2 wil be 2-3 years ahead of it.
Ive recently played the game painkiller on 1600x1200 and i think its 12-18 months ahead of doom3. Oh well we all make mistakes......
Im suprised so many people are impressed by the graphics cause im not.